« Another great escape by Chong Davis reaches another venue »

Another paper's view

The Guardian, February 8:

A year ago, China Daily gushed with upbeat epithets about the co- operation between the United States and China.

The relationship was already effective and smooth on trade, Taiwan and global warning. With two firm multilateralists - Barack Obama and Joe Biden - now in power, it would be positively strengthened and constructive, the official mouthpiece opined.

How different the pandora style beads picture looks today and how wounded the official tone.

China sent a deputy foreign minister to negotiate with Obama in Copenhagen, scuppering the deal that not just the US but many other countries wanted. Next came the cyber-attacks on Google.

Then the White House approved a decision to sell patriot missiles to Taiwan, announced that Obama would meet the Dalai Lama and lectured China on its overvalued currency.

Forget the metaphor of resetting relations, which the US used recently with Russia. Hardly a month goes by when the US and China can resist pushing each other's buttons.

Is China's assertiveness and Obama's hardened attitude all down to economics - to the former's impressive performance during the global recession and the replica rolex latter's much weaker one?

Economists reckon the Chinese currency, which has remained at the same value since July 2008, is undervalued by 25 per cent to 40 per cent. Even on the lower figure, the effect of a correction on the currencies of neighbours like Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan would be major, and would collectively help cut the US deficit by $100 billion and create 700,000 jobs.

Reopening the battle with China over its currency is not a bad move, therefore, as Obama faces difficult midterm elections in November.

Both the US and China are trying to power their way forward with export booms and each requires a low valuation of its currency to do that.

But politics matter too. China's foreign policy has become more assertive as nationalism becomes dominant. For all the lip service to multilateralism, China is more hostile to sanctions on Iran than Russia.

replica breitling

A nationalist China is, however, more tied into the global economy than ever before.

Two-thirds of China's $2.4 trillion currency reserves are held in dollars. If it dumped the US treasury bonds and shares in which these dollars are invested, China could trigger a collapse of the dollar, and world markets, and another global recession.

To whom would China be able to export then? Certainly not to the US or the EU. China's key economic interest lies in continuing to fund US debt.

So there are limits to the current US-China jousting. Each is repainting its red lines and stepping over the other's. But at some point national interest says this must stop. Neither of the tetchy twins can do without the other.

--------------------


Other articles:
http://www.csdtd.com/Blog/View/?886
http://www.xbjsjz.com/Overseas-Chinese-slam-Dalai-La.html
http://blog.0731fdc.com/?uid-88659-action-viewspace-itemid-4669
http://www.goeroeblogs.be/blog.php?user=mywatches¬e=3458
http://www.khgd.net/Blog/View/?3761

Post comment:

◎welcome to give out your point。